They use it to explain practically everything about human psychology.  And when an old idea is disproved, no problem, they explain the new theory in terms of evolution.  The notion of free will with an evolutionary psychologist is a non-starter.  So, their research tends to follow from that. 

The assumption is determinism, that “… every event, including human cognition and behaviour, decision and action, is causally determined by an unbroken chain of prior occurrences.” (1)

The next assumption is that all human behavior serves an evolutionary purpose.  Now, let us stop and consider for a moment the societal implications of such a view. 

1). Law and its consequences are largely based on the notion of free will. 

2). The notion of marriage is a religious institution..or at least that’s how it started.

3). In the US at least, we believe that all people are created equally and have sought to right wrongs against folks who were not treated as if they were created equally.

So, quite simply, one could view the motivation of evolutionary psychology as having the intent (consciously or unconsciously) of undermining the most important elements for the stability of society.  Even though these elements would likely be viewed as ‘adaptive’ in allowing the species to survive.  As an aside, I wonder what an evolutionary explanation would be for the study of evolutionary psychology (in other words, how is DNA preserved through this pursuit).  But I digress….

So from an evolutionary psychology perspective, which has an underlying liberal political perspective in the US, people are not responsible for their behavior (”My genes made me do it!”), marriage is whatever you want it to be, and people with different characteristics could be considered less evolved or at least posing a threat to the survival of the most fit DNA.

Now all of this despite the fact that no simple aspect of human behavior has found to be genetically determined.  There’s some evidence for general dispositions (emotional reactivity or sensation seeking), but as for specific behaviors, there is no evidence for any specific behavior that is tied to our genes.

So, I will present some evidence that evolutionary psychology undermines the basis for civilization, if accepted.

Evidence for the undermining of point 1.

Why Men Rape  — It helps propagate the gene pool!!  It’s not about power, domination, and control.  What were you thinking?

Muslims Resort to Suicide Bombing with Hopes of Breeding  — See point 4.  It asserts that since Muslims are polygymist, that there are less females available.  So the the offer of 72 virgins in the after life offers them a chance to finally propogate their genes!  So, I suppose the problem of Muslim suicide bombers would be solved by allowing them to rape someone or otherwise propagate their genes.  That motivation would completely disappear….right??  If you want to actually learn something about the Arab mind, I recommend ShrinkWrapped’s currently 15 part series.

Crime is the result of men’s competitive desires  — See point 7.  Those who act violently towards other men, may have been more likely to reproduce!  So, next time you feel angry, go ahead and punch the sucker.  You’re more likely to have some fun in bed if so, and if you’re lucky, keep the DNA of humans going!  Or, play that midnight basketball, that will give you an outlet for you competitive strivings based on our evolutionary history….but I’m not sure how it will help you spread your genes.  Worth a try though…who knows, right??

Evidence for undermining point 2.

Humans are by nature polygamist– See point 7.  That’s right…and we should pass laws allowing polygamy then!  It asserts that men benefit from monogamy…hmmph….and women benefit from polygamy…what??  That doesn’t seem right to me, but what the hey, I’m a man…  Now, I really don’t think the government should have anything to do with marriage as it is a religious institution, but that is beside the point.  But we’d be fine as far as suicide bombers coming from the US go, because Christianity has no promise of virgins in the afterlife.

Homosexuality and the consolation prize — That’s right…for you homosexual males…your problem is that you can’t find a woman.  And ditto (opposite obviously) for lesbians.  But, again, I think marriage should be between folk and God.  But the government’s involvement has sociological ramifications when they allow gay marriage….  The government should have no part in marriage.

Evidence for point 3.

Asians rock, whites are so-so, and blacks…well…  Okay, so it’s just fine to be a racist.  Let’s go ahead and kill off those two inferior sub-types…so that we end up with a superior gene pool.  I think everyone knows where this type of thinking has led in the past.

So you think evolutionary psychology is cool???  I don’t…  I think if it were accepted on large scale, it would undermine the basis of civilization.  Not only that, but I think it is blatantly false in almost all of its assertions.

(1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism